A bank transfer delay turned into a nightmare after a car buyer was arrested over an alleged fake alert. When the payment reflected the next day and he demanded a refund instead of the car, the dealer refused. Who do you think is right in this situation?
“Someone went to a car lot to buy a car after making payment through a bank transfer. The car dealer said he didn't receive any money.
So the boy told him to wait and be patient, saying it could be a network issue. But the car dealer insisted it was a fake alert and accused him of trying to sc@m him. He called the police, and they arrested the boy, saying he was a fr@udster.
After 24 hours, which was the next day, the car dealer finally received the alert, and the boy was released.
The boy then said that since the whole thing had turned out that way, he was no longer interested in buying the car and demanded a refund. The car dealer told him he wasn't making any refund and insisted that he must collect the car he had already paid for.
If na you be that boy, you go collect the car or you go stand say you wan collect your money...?”
- Lady shares how a car buyer was arrested over an alleged f@ke alert before the payment reflected, sparking debate over a refund.
